Facing constant pressure all game, Michael Vick was as contained as the Packers could have hoped for. Without a spark for most of the game, consistently killing themselves with penalties and watching young James Starks run all over their defense, the routinely high-flying Eagles found themselves in a predicament. David Akers, their future hall-of-fame kicker who misses less than a lunar eclipse occurs, missed two field goals that changed the dynamic of the game and Michael Vick through an interception in the end zone with :33 seconds left on the clock. As the Packers head to Atlanta to face the Falcons, the Eagles will watch from home and reminisce on the season it was.
Sunday, January 9, 2011
Categories: atlanta falcons, david akers, eagles, field goal, hall of fame, james starks, michael vick, packers
Posted on Sunday, January 09, 2011 by Unknown
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Hot Now!
-
Listen to internet radio with jzsports on Blog Talk Radio
-
It was a fight of epic proportions – Ortiz vs. Mayweather. Yet it failed to live up to the hype, and instead gave fans a taste of the real...
-
This call was questionable enough...how about now? The New York Giants settled for a field goal against Green Bay after not being awarded th...
-
With a spacious Lincoln-tunnel gap and a respected slap shot, Washington Capitals star Alex Ovechkin needs only the occasional wink to keep ...
-
Listen to internet radio with jzsports on Blog Talk Radio
-
In the final round of the 2013 Arnold Palmer Invitational, Sergio Garcia hits his second shot from a tree near the fairway on the par-4 10t...
-
We're dipping our toes in the water with a historical recap of Wes Welker's subtle mockery back in 2011, before the Pats-Jets divisi...
-
Samsung was pleasantly hosting an event yesterday at the American Museum of Finance, before NFL star-professional drooler Eli Manning expect...
-
Breakfast..... Three fried-egg sandwiches loaded with cheese, lettuce, tomatoes, fried onions and mayonnaise. Two cups of coffee. One f...
Powered by Blogger.
.
.
.
.
.
.
0 comments:
Post a Comment