Facing constant pressure all game, Michael Vick was as contained as the Packers could have hoped for. Without a spark for most of the game, consistently killing themselves with penalties and watching young James Starks run all over their defense, the routinely high-flying Eagles found themselves in a predicament. David Akers, their future hall-of-fame kicker who misses less than a lunar eclipse occurs, missed two field goals that changed the dynamic of the game and Michael Vick through an interception in the end zone with :33 seconds left on the clock. As the Packers head to Atlanta to face the Falcons, the Eagles will watch from home and reminisce on the season it was.
Sunday, January 9, 2011
Categories: atlanta falcons, david akers, eagles, field goal, hall of fame, james starks, michael vick, packers
Posted on Sunday, January 09, 2011 by Unknown
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Hot Now!
-
This call was questionable enough...how about now? The New York Giants settled for a field goal against Green Bay after not being awarded th...
-
It was a fight of epic proportions – Ortiz vs. Mayweather. Yet it failed to live up to the hype, and instead gave fans a taste of the real...
-
The often humble receiver is miked up during the Texans/Titans game and we get a close-up look at what provoked the heavyweight battle betwe...
-
Listen to internet radio with jzsports on Blog Talk Radio
-
Honestly, am I the only one who is completely sick of the Ryan family? Rex and Rob Ryan talk more trash than teenage girls on Facebook, a...
-
Today's game against the Royals was no routine outing for Rays pitcher Alex Cobb, who was drilled in the noggin by a powerful line dri...
-
One of the world's most powerful friendships now appears to be on the rocks as Vladimir Putin has been accused of stealing Robert Kraft...
-
Just don't blame Steve Bartman... (image via msnbcmedia.msn.com )
-
Here is a hilarious collection of NFL logos formed with Peyton Manning's sad face. We'll give you our eight favorite, but believe us...
Powered by Blogger.
.
.
.
.
.
.
0 comments:
Post a Comment